Tutorial
During the tutorial we were asked to view the following website, ICYouSee Critical Thinking page (http://www.ithaca.edu/library/training/think.html) which has strategies for evaluating and briefly describe them. Then view here or here and see if there is any further tips.
Six Suggestions when examining web pages:
- Make sure you're in the right place
- When in doubt, doubt
- Consider the source
- Know what's happening
- Look at the details
- Distinguish web pages from pages found on the web
Authority
Who are the authors of the Web page, or who is responsible for it? What gives them their authority or expertise to write?
Accuracy
Do you have good reason to believe that the information on the site is accurate? Are the facts documented?
Objectivity
What is the author's point of view? What is the purpose of the site?
Currency
When was the information on the page originally written? Has the site been kept up-to-date?
Coverage
Does this site address the topic you are researching? Is the information basic and cursory or detailed and scholarly? However complex the language might be, is the information substantial?
Value
Was the page worth visiting? Does the site offer anything informative, unique, or insightful? Is the site free of careless errors, misspelled words, and poor grammar?
- WHAT is the publishing body of this page? The key is the domain name, located in the URL.
- WHO is the author? Does the author list credentials? Is the author an amateur or a professional in this field? Is there a way to contact the author for further information?
- WHY is this page on the WWW? Are they trying to sell you something? Is the information unbiased, or does the author "have an agenda?"
- WHEN was the page last updated? Even though currency may not be an issue for some types of information, it is important that the page be maintained. Most reputable sites will include a date of last update.
We were then asked to go onto the following website and evaluate two of the web sites that were given and answer a range of questions on them:
Web Page 1 (The Psychedelic Sixties) :
Accuracy - I believe that this websites information is accurate as it was written by people of the University of Virginia which makes the information more reliable as it is from a reliable source. It's from 1998 which was 10 years ago making the information reliable as it is reporting about the 60's so the information isn't going to change.
Authorship - Again, I believe that because it was written by people of the University of Virginia that it makes the web page seem more authentic.
Purpose - The purpose of this web page to show memorabilia from the 1960's.
Detail and Design - The detail and the design doesn't look very professional as it is in the colours of the rainbow but it goes with the theme of the 60's.
Overall Worth - It is worthy if you are interested in the 60's or you are after information from the 60's as it would be an interesting and reliable source. It's easy to understand and the layout is organised so that you can easily find what you may be looking for.
Web Page 2 (Sixties Project) :
Accuracy - It doesn't seem very accurate as the information isn't by anybody who would have studied the specific subject. It looks as though someone with some spare time made up this website for their own personal use.
Authorship - It is an unknown author making it more unreliable as they are not qualified about the subject.
Purpose - A website about stories of the 1960's.
Detail and Design - The detail and design is very poor, the layout is very basic and plain. It doesn't have very much information and it doesn't look appealing to the eye. The picture on the homepage looks like it's from clip art which makes you think that it hasn't been designed very well.
Overall Worth - It isn't really worthy and it doesn't have very much information on the given topic.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
LectureDuring this weeks lecture we learnt the following important points when it comes to evaluation and authentication (Searching & Finding Quality Information on the World-wide Web):
- That anyone can put up a web page
- There is no quality control
- Not all sites are "created equal"
- You may be measuring the content, visual feel, navigation, ease-of-use
- Suggested Criteria -
Accuracy, Authority, Objectivity, Currency and Coverage - Authentication Considerations
- Why's the pages been put up on the web?






